CONTROL FOR PERSONAL AGENDA

What screams out from this debate is, “we have enough social problems…”

Who put this guy or ANYONE for that matter, in charge of social issues?

So here we go again with another person/group thinking they know how everyone else should live, the choices they should make and limiting choice and imposing their ideology onto everyone else.

When we limit choice we are doing one thing: attempting to control others for personal agenda

It’s none of anyone’s business what choices an individual wants to make in so much as that choice is a cost NO to others without their consent. The choices others make are your business only when those choices result in a cost to you.

We lack development of personal responsibility because we will not teach individuals the efficacy of their choices, example outcomes and let them create a sense of trust from within toward self-reliance and self-governance.

Who’s minding your business while you’re so busy minding everyone else’s?

Control is what it's all about.

You can't decry the control others seek if you're seeking to control, as well.

Seek freedom, whether you agree with an individual's choices or not.

FREE SPEECH

Question the motives of those who seek to be offended or find things offensive, theirs is a personal agenda of control of others behavior.

Prior restraint cannot be upheld as there is no one who knows what can or cannot be said, heard, written in our society if we are to uphold freedom of speech in any capacity. And who would be in charge of such? Who will claim to know for every other American or non-American what can and cannot be said?

If you limit the speech of one, you make a target for your own back.

Those who seek such restraint seek to silence others – there are no inherent rights of humans to not be offended.

Society needs to stop appeasing people; society doesn't exist for your comfort.

Let the words written, heard, seen, or expressed be the observation of others as to the nature of the individual who said it.

In a free market society, the market (the people) speaks with their dollars or kinship, thus letting the product (the individual) know the reality of what will be accepted or not accepted.

Each has a choice to express their opinions - this upholds freedom of both parties.